Consent Preferences

ICH GCP E6 R3 Glossary: summary of changes in Good Clinical Practice

A concise ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary highlighting key changes, updated definitions, and Good Clinical Practice updates, including E6 R2 vs E6 R3 differences.

ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary, ICH GCP E6 R3, good clinical practice training, good clinical practice certification, good clinical practice certificate, ich gcp good clinical practice certification, ich gcp training, ich gcp certification, ich gcp course, citi training , citi gcp , Pharma education

What Is the ICH GCP E6 R3 Glossary?

The ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary provides updated definitions and terminology aligned with the latest Good Clinical Practice E6 R3 guidance.

The ICH E6 R3 guideline describes standards that apply to all aspects of clinical trial planning, conduct, oversight, and reporting. Put simply, ICH E6 R3 describes standards that apply to every stakeholder — from sponsors and investigators to CROs and ethics committees. Finalized on January 6, 2025, it represents a significant evolution in clinical trial standards. One of the most notable changes is its expanded and modernized glossary, which reflects the increasing digitalization of clinical trials and the need for clearer definitions in the evolving research landscape.

This glossary helps sponsors, CROs, and investigators quickly understand new terms and requirements in E6 R3. If you’re working on your ICH GCP certification or taking GCP training, you need to know these updates.
This comprehensive analysis examines the key changes to the glossary, including new terms, revised definitions, and removed terminology, along with the rationale behind these modifications. We’ll show you exactly what changed and why it matters for your Good Clinical Practice certification.

Quick Facts About ICH E6 R3

  • Released: January 6, 2025
  • Previous version: E6 (R2) from November 2016
  • Main focus: Digital trials and data integrity
  • Impact: All clinical research professionals

Key changes introduced in the ICH GCP E6 R3 Glossary

The glossary isn’t just definitions. It’s the foundation of clinical research language. In contrast to E6 (R2), where the Glossary was positioned at the beginning of the guidance, E6 (R3) places it at the end.  

The E6 (R3) revision introduces several new terms, many of which address the digital transformation of clinical trials and enhanced data governance requirements. Below are key ICH E6 R3 glossary terms with updated definitions aligned with Good Clinical Practice E6 R3:

  • ASSENT: This is a new GCP definition specifically addressing pediatric clinical trials, defining the agreement of a child or adolescent to participate in research. “Affirmative agreement of a minor to participate in clinical trial. The absence of expression of agreement or disagreement should not be interpreted as assent”.  This addition reflects the growing emphasis on involving minors in age-appropriate decision-making about their participation in clinical trials.
    • Why it’s important: Pediatric trials are growing fast. The FDA and EMA require proper assent processes.
    • Real-world example: A 12-year-old with diabetes can give assent to join a new insulin study. The parents give consent, but the child must also agree.
    • What you should know:
      • Know the difference between consent and assent
      • Understand age requirements in different countries
      • Learn documentation requirements
  • COMPUTERISED SYSTEMS VALIDATION: This is the process of proving that computer systems used in clinical trials work correctly and meet regulatory requirements. “A process of establishing and documenting that the specified requirements of a computerised system can be consistently fulfilled from design until decommissioning of the system or transition to a new system. The approach to validation should be based on a risk assessment that takes into consideration the intended use of the system and the potential of the system to affect trial participant protection and the reliability of trial results”.
    • Why it’s critical: Every electronic system in modern trials must be validated. This includes:
      • Electronic data capture (EDC) systems
      • Randomization systems
      • Laboratory information systems
      • Patient-reported outcome platforms
    • Key validation requirements:
      • Risk-based approach to validation
      • Documentation of system specifications
      • Testing protocols and results
      • User training records
      • Change control procedures
    • What you should know:
      • Learn validation lifecycle processes
      • Understand risk assessment methods
      • Know documentation requirements
      • Practice validation case studies 
  • DATA ACQUISITION TOOL (DAT): This term encompasses any instrument, device, or system used to collect, record, or capture clinical trial data, whether electronic or paper-based, so any system used to collect trial data. “A paper or electronic tool designed to collect data and associated metadata from a data originator in a clinical trial according to the protocol and to report the data to the sponsor.
    The data originator may be a human (e.g., the participant or trial staff), a machine (e.g., wearables and sensors) or a computer system from which the electronic transfer of data from one system to another has been undertaken (e.g., extraction of data from an electronic health record or laboratory system).
    Examples of DATs include but are not limited to CRFs, interactive response technologies (IRTs), clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and wearable devices, irrespective of the media used”
    .
    • Rationale: This broad definition acknowledges the diverse methods now used for data collection, from traditional case report forms to wearable devices and mobile applications.
    • Examples include:
      • Electronic data capture (EDC) systems
      • Wearable devices
      • Mobile apps
      • Paper case report forms
      • Laboratory instruments
    • Why it matters: Modern trials use many different tools. Understanding data acquisition tools helps with:
      • System selection
      • Validation requirements
      • Training staff
      • Regulatory compliance
  • DATA INTEGRITY: Data must be complete, consistent, accurate, trustworthy, and reliable throughout its entire lifecycle. “Data integrity includes the degree to which data fulfill key criteria of being attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate, complete, secure, and reliable such that data are fit for purpose”.
    • The ALCOA+ principle:
      • Attributable: Who created or changed the data?
      • Legible: Can the data be read clearly?
      • Contemporaneous: Was data recorded when the activity occurred?
      • Original: Is this the first recording of the data?
      • Accurate: Is the data correct and complete?
      • + Complete, Consistent, Enduring, Available
    • Why it’s fundamental: Data integrity failures lead to:
      • FDA warning letters
      • Study invalidation
      • Legal consequences
      • Career damage
    • Training focus areas:
      • ALCOA+ principles application
      • Data governance frameworks
      • Integrity risk assessments
      • Corrective action procedures
    • Real-world application: your ICH GCP training course should include data integrity scenarios based on actual FDA/EMA inspection findings.
  • METADATA: is defined as data that provides information about other data, including but not limited to the source, creation date, modification history, and context of the primary data. “The contextual information required to understand a given data element. Metadata is structured information that describes, explains or otherwise makes it easier to retrieve, use or manage data. For the purpose of this guideline, relevant metadata are those needed to allow the appropriate evaluation of the trial conduct”.
    • Rationale: As clinical trials become increasingly digital, metadata has become crucial for ensuring data integrity, traceability, and regulatory compliance.
    • Simple example: When you take a photo, metadata includes:
      • Date and time
      • Camera settings
      • Location (if enabled)
      • File size
      In clinical trials, metadata shows:
      • Who entered data
      • When it was entered
      • What changes were made
      • System information
    • What you should know:
      • Learn types of metadata
      • Understand storage requirements
      • Know how inspectors use metadata
  • REFERENCE SAFETY INFORMATION (RSI): The approved product information or other reference document containing safety information used to assess the expectedness of adverse reactions. Therefore it is the official safety information used to judge if side effects are expected or unexpected “Contains a cumulative list of ADRs that are expected for the investigational product being administered to participants in a clinical trial. The RSI is included in the Investigator’s Brochure or alternative documents according to applicable regulatory requirements. Refer to ICH E2F Development Safety Update Report for more information about RSI”.
    • Rationale: This term provides clarity for safety reporting requirements and standardizes the reference point for assessing suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs).
    • Why it’s vital: Safety reporting depends on RSI. Wrong RSI leads to incorrect reporting timelines.
    • Sources of RSI:
      • Investigator’s Brochure
      • Package inserts
      • Summary of Product Characteristics
      • FDA labels
  •  SIGNATURE: Enhanced and expanded to include both handwritten signatures and validated electronic signatures, reflecting technological advances in consent processes and document authentication. “A unique mark, symbol or entry executed, adopted or authorised by an individual, in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements and/or practice to show expression of will and allow authentication of the signatory (i.e., establish a high degree of certainty that a record was signed by the claimed signatory). A signature may be physical or electronic”.
    • Old definition: Handwritten name
    • New definition: Handwritten OR validated electronic signature 
    • What changed: Full acceptance of electronic signatures in all trial documents.
    • Impact on training:
      • Your Good Clinical Practice training should cover e-signature validation
      • Regulatory requirements for electronic signatures
      • Security measures for digital signing.
  • SUSPECTED UNEXPECTED SERIOUS ADVERSE REACTIONS (SUSAR): While the concept existed in E6 (R2), E6 (R3) provides a more comprehensive definition and formal inclusion in the glossary. It means serious side effects that weren’t expected based on current knowledge.  “An adverse reaction that meets three
    criteria: suspected, unexpected and serious.
      • Suspected: There is a reasonable possibility that the drug caused the adverse drug reaction.
      • Unexpected: An adverse reaction, the nature or severity of which is not consistent with the applicable product information (e.g., Investigator’s Brochure or alternative documents according to applicable regulatory requirements; see RSI).
      • Serious: See above for SAE”.
    • What you should know:
      • Know the exact definition
      • Understand reporting timelines
      • Learn documentation requirements
      • Practice case study examples

Revised Terms and Definitions: what changed and why

Some existing terms got major updates. Here’s what you need to know:

  • ADVERSE EVENTS AND ADVERSE REACTION-RELATED DEFINITIONS: Enhanced definition: “Adverse Event (AE): Any unfavourable medical occurrence in a trial participant administered the investigational product. The adverse event does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment”.
    • What are the key updates:
      • Adverse Event: Clearer distinction between events occurring during trial participation vs. those related to the investigational product.
      • Adverse Reaction: Enhanced definition emphasizing causal relationship assessment.
      • Serious Adverse Event: Expanded criteria including persistent or significant disability/incapacity.
      • Unexpected Adverse Reaction: Refined definition linking to Reference Safety Information (RSI)
    • Why these changes matter:
      • More precise safety reporting requirements.
      • Better alignment with pharmacovigilance regulations
      • Clearer guidance for causality assessment
      • Standardized approach across global regions
    • What you should know:
      • Learn updated reporting timelines
      • Understand new causality criteria
      • Practice with revised case studies
      • Master RSI-based expectedness assessment
  • AUDIT TRAIL: Formally defined to address computerized system requirements, an audit trail is now recognized as a secure, computer-generated, time-stamped electronic record that allows reconstruction of the course of events relating to the creation, modification, or deletion of an electronic record. So basically, electronic records should show who changed data and when. “Metadata records that allow the appropriate evaluation of the course of events by capturing details on actions (manual or automated) performed relating to information and data collection and, where applicable, to activities in computerised systems. The audit trail should show activities, initial entry and changes to data fields or records, by whom, when and, where applicable, why. In computerised systems, the audit trail should be secure, computer-generated and time stamped”.
      • Rationale: The inclusion of this term reflects the widespread adoption of electronic data capture systems and the regulatory need for comprehensive data integrity measures.
      • Why it’s critical: Data integrity is everything in clinical trials. Regulatory inspectors always check audit trails.
      • What you should know:
        • Must be computer-generated
        • Cannot be changed or deleted
        • Shows complete history of data changes
        • Required for all electronic systems
      • Training tip: Practice reading audit trail reports. 
  • GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE (GCP): Updated definition: “A standard for the planning, initiating, performing, recording, oversight, evaluation, analysis and reporting of clinical trials that provides assurance that the data and reported results are reliable and that the rights, safety and well-being of trial participants are protected”.
    More precisely, the ICH E6 R3 guideline describes standards that apply to sponsors, investigators, IRBs/IECs, and service providers involved in the planning, conduct, and reporting of clinical trials involving human participants. This new definition has been expanded to emphasize that GCP is “an international, ethical, scientific, and quality standard,” with a stronger emphasis on quality by design principles. The previous definition (R2) was based on ethical and quality standards; however, the new definition emphasizes that it is an “international, ethical, scientific, AND quality standard with risk-based approaches.” This means that GCP isn’t just about following rules. It’s about building quality into every aspect of trials.
  • INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD  (IRB)/INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEE (IEC): Enhanced definition: “An independent body (a review board or a committee, institutional, regional, national or supranational) constituted of medical professionals and non-medical members whose responsibility it is to ensure the protection of the rights, safety and well-being of human participants involved in a trial and to provide public assurance of that protection by, among other things, reviewing and approving/providing favourable opinion on the trial protocol, the suitability of the investigator(s), the facilities, and the methods and material to be used in obtaining and documenting informed consent of the trial participants. The legal status, composition, function, operations and regulatory requirements pertaining to IRBs/IECs may differ among countries but should allow the IRB/IEC to act in agreement with GCP as described in this guideline”.
    • Major updates:
      • Expanded composition requirements: More specific guidance on member qualifications and independence
      • Digital review processes: Acceptance of electronic submissions and virtual meetings
      • Risk-based review: Tailored review frequency based on trial risk assessment
      • Continuing review: More flexible approaches for low-risk studies
    • New responsibilities:
      • Review of digital consent processes
      • Assessment of data governance plans
      • Evaluation of computerized systems
      • Oversight of decentralized trial elements
  • ESSENTIAL RECORDS: Expanded Definition: “Essential records are the documents and data (and relevant metadata), in any format, associated with a clinical trial that facilitate the ongoing management of the trial and collectively allow the evaluation of the methods used, the factors affecting a trial and the actions taken during the trial conduct to determine the reliability of the trial results produced and the verification that the trial was conducted in accordance with GCP and applicable regulatory requirements (see Appendix C)”. The definition has been broadened to encompass various media formats and emphasizes the concept of “fitness for purpose” rather than prescriptive record-keeping requirements.
    • Key changes:
      • Includes all media formats (paper, electronic, digital)
      • Emphasizes “fitness for purpose”
      • Covers modern storage methods
    • Why it matters: Electronic records are now fully equal to paper records. Your Good Clinical Practice certification must cover both.
  • INVESTIGATOR: Expanded responsibilities: “A person responsible for the conduct of the clinical trial, including the trial participants for whom that person has responsibility during the conduct of the trial. If a trial is conducted by a team of individuals, the investigator is the responsible leader of the team and may be called the principal investigator.
    Where an investigator/institution is referenced in this guideline, it describes expectations that may be applicable to the investigator and/or the institution in some regions. Where required by the applicable regulatory requirements, the “investigator” should be read as “investigator and/or the institution”.
    • The enhanced definition now includes:
      • Digital oversight: Responsibility for computerized systems used at their site
      • Data governance: Active role in ensuring data integrity throughout trial
      • Service provider management: Oversight of delegated activities to external parties
      • Technology validation: Understanding and approval of electronic systems
    • What you should know:
      • Basic computerized systems validation knowledge
      • Data integrity assessment capabilities
      • Electronic signature authorization
      • Digital monitoring participation
  • INVESTIGATOR SITE: Modernized definition: “The location(s) where trial-related activities are conducted and/or coordinated under the investigator’s/institution’s oversight”.
    • The expanded concept:
      • is adapted for clinical trial operations in decentralised settings
      • Technology infrastructure: Digital capabilities and system requirements
      • Multiple locations: Satellite sites and mobile units
    • New site requirements:
      • Computerized system validation capability
      • Data integrity compliance infrastructure
      • Service provider coordination systems
      • Digital patient engagement platforms
  • SPONSOR: enhanced responsibilities: “An individual, company, institution or organisation that takes responsibility for the initiation, management and arrangement of the financing of a clinical trial. A clinical trial may have one or several sponsors where permitted under regulatory requirements. All sponsors have the responsibilities of a sponsor set out in this guideline. In accordance with applicable regulatory requirements, sponsors may decide in a documented agreement setting out their respective responsibilities. Where the documented agreement does not specify to which sponsor a given responsibility is attributed, that responsibility lies with all sponsors”.
    • Expanded definition now includes:
      • Digital transformation leadership: Overall responsibility for trial digitalization
      • Data governance: Comprehensive data integrity framework implementation
      • Service provider ecosystem: Management of complex outsourcing relationships
      • Technology validation: Oversight of all computerized systems validation
    • New sponsor obligations:
      • Risk-based quality management system implementation
      • Comprehensive service provider qualification and oversight
      • Data integrity assurance throughout trial lifecycle
      • Computerized systems validation program leadership

Terms Removed or Consolidated

  • SUBJECT vs TRIAL PARTICIPANT: the term “Subject” was replaced by “Trial Participant”: “An individual who participates in a clinical trial who is expected to receive the investigational product(s) or as a control. In this guideline, trial participant and participant are used interchangeably”.
    • Enhanced definition to reflect:
      • Digital engagement: Participants using electronic systems and devices
      • Remote participation: Home-based and virtual trial activities
      • Data contribution: Active role in electronic data capture and reporting
      • Technology interaction: Use of mobile apps, wearables, and digital tools
    • New participant considerations:
      • Digital literacy: Technology comfort and capability requirements
      • Remote consent: Electronic informed consent processes
      • Data privacy: Enhanced protections for electronic personal information
      • Support systems: Technical assistance and troubleshooting access
  • CRO vs SERVICE PROVIDER: the term “CRO” was replaced by “Service Provider”.  “A person or organisation (commercial, academic or other) providing a service used by either the sponsor or the investigator to fulfill trial-related activities”. So, basically, the term has expanded to include any external organization or individual who conducts clinical trial activities on behalf of the sponsor or investigator.
    • Common types of service providers:
      • Contract Research Organizations (CROs)
      • Clinical data management companies
      • Statistical analysis providers
      • Monitoring organizations
      • Technology vendors
      • Site management organizations
    • Key regulatory requirements:
      • Written agreements defining responsibilities
      • Qualification and selection processes
      • Ongoing oversight and monitoring
      • Quality management systems
      • Compliance with GCP requirements
    • What you should know:
      • Service provider selection criteria
      • Contract management principles
      • Oversight responsibilities
      • Performance monitoring methods
  • SOURCE DOCUMENTS AND DATA vs SOURCE RECORDS: the terms Source Documents and Source Data were replaced by Source documents. The definition has been revised to read: “Original documents or data (which includes relevant metadata) or certified copies of the original documents or data, irrespective of the media used. This may include trial participants’ medical/health records/notes/charts; data provided/entered by trial participants (e.g., electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs)); healthcare professionals’ records from pharmacies, laboratories and other facilities involved in the clinical trial; and data from automated instruments, such as wearables and sensors”. This new definition is updated to explicitly include electronic health records and other digital sources, reflecting the reality of modern healthcare delivery and data capture.
      • Major addition: Explicit inclusion of:
        • Electronic health records (EHRs)
        • Digital medical devices
        • Wearable technology data
      • Mobile health apps

Why the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary matters for Clinical Research

Understanding the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary is essential for correctly applying updated terminology introduced in Good Clinical Practice E6 R3. At its core, the ICH E6 R3 guideline describes standards that apply to every professional involved in clinical research, from sponsors and CROs to investigators and site staff. The revised definitions clarify regulatory expectations, support a risk-based approach to quality, and help ensure consistent interpretation across sponsors, CROs, investigators, and clinical research teams. Familiarity with these updates also helps professionals recognize key E6 R2 vs E6 R3 differences, improving compliance, training, and inspection readiness in modern clinical trials.

Digital transformation focus in clinical trials

ICH GCP E6 R3 reflects the massive shift to digital trials, therefore, a significant portion of the new terminology relates to digitalization:

  • Computerized Systems: Enhanced definition covering validation, security, and user management. Computerized systems validation: Now mandatory knowledge
  • Electronic Signature: Formal recognition alongside traditional signatures. Full regulatory acceptance
  • Data Life Cycle: Introduction of comprehensive data management concepts
  • Quality by Design: Integration of proactive quality management principles
  • Data integrity: Central to all operations
  • Digital patient engagement: New standard practice

Implementation considerations

Update your Good Clinical Practice training programs

Organizations must invest in comprehensive and updated Good Clinical Practice training programs to ensure all stakeholders understand the new terminology and its practical applications.

System Updates:

Clinical trial management systems, electronic data capture platforms, and quality management systems may require updates to align with new definitions.

Documentation Review:

Existing templates, SOPs, and training materials need systematic review and updating to incorporate new terminology.

What should your updated ICH GCP training cover?

Using the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary in training ensures study teams correctly implement new Good Clinical Practice requirements. Look for Good Clinical Practice training that includes:

  • Complete E6(R3) Annex 2 requirements with real-world examples
  • Strategies for implementing risk-based quality management
  • Data governance and integrity across multiple sources
  • Requirements for technology integration and validation
  • Decentralized trial management and oversight
  • Guidance tailored to specific roles

The training should be interactive and engaging and feature case studies and scenarios that mirror real-life challenges.
Pro Tip: Don’t just focus on the changes. Understanding the principles of E6(R3) Annex 2 will help you make better decisions in ambiguous situations.

Conclusion

In summary, the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary is an essential resource for clinical research professionals seeking to understand updated Good Clinical Practice requirements. By reviewing key changes and familiarizing themselves with the new definitions, teams can ensure compliance, adapt to E6 R2 vs E6 R3 differences, and apply the latest regulatory guidance effectively. Staying current with the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary supports better trial oversight, risk-based quality management, and consistent implementation of Good Clinical Practice standards across all clinical studies.

The glossary changes in ICH GCP E6 R3 represent more than simple definitional updates; they reflect a fundamental shift toward digitalized, patient-centric, and risk-based clinical trial conduct. These changes acknowledge the reality of modern clinical research while maintaining the core principles of participant protection and data integrity.
Organizations implementing E6 R3 should view these glossary changes as an opportunity to modernize their clinical trial operations, enhance their quality management systems, and better align with global regulatory expectations. The emphasis on digital terminology and data governance reflects the industry’s evolution and provides a framework for embracing future innovations while maintaining the highest standards of scientific rigor and participant protection.
Take Action Today:

  1. Register in updated GCP training immediately
  2. Ensure your team is also trained on the updated ICH GCP R3  training
  3. Review the complete E6 R3 guideline
  4. Practice with new terminology daily
  5. Connect with other professionals updating their skills
  6. Plan your certification timeline

To successfully implement these changes, all stakeholders in clinical research must work together. This includes sponsors, CROs, investigative sites, and regulatory authorities. By understanding and applying these new definitions, the clinical research community can continue to improve safe and effective medical treatments. This will help them adapt to the digital age of clinical trials.

Don’t let auditors catch you or anyone in your team unprepared. We offer team discounts. Join thousands of clinical research professionals who have improved their skills with PharmaEduCenter’s updated ICH GCP Good Clinical Practice training.

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions on the ICH GCP E6 R3 Glossary

The ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary is a comprehensive list of updated terms and definitions introduced in Good Clinical Practice E6 R3. It helps clinical research teams understand regulatory requirements and apply them consistently across trials.

Key E6 R2 vs E6 R3 differences include updated terminology for risk-based quality management, new definitions for critical terms, and revisions to clarify Good Clinical Practice expectations. The glossary highlights these changes for easy reference.

Understanding the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary ensures that sponsors, CROs, and investigators apply updated definitions correctly, maintain compliance, and align trial processes with the latest Good Clinical Practice standards.

The ICH E6 R3 guideline describes standards that apply to the planning, initiation, performance, recording, oversight, evaluation, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials. These standards apply to all key stakeholders, sponsors, investigators, CROs (now called service providers), and IRBs/IECs, across all types of clinical trials involving human participants.

The ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary includes several new terms related to risk-based quality management, critical-to-quality factors, and trial oversight. These updates support consistent interpretation of Good Clinical Practice requirements.

Teams can use the ICH GCP E6 R3 glossary as a training tool to familiarize staff with updated definitions, key changes, and regulatory expectations, ensuring audits and inspections are conducted in compliance with Good Clinical Practice.

Share with friends
Share with colleagues

knock knock

"May I enter your inbox?"

📩 Stay ahead in clinical research with actionable regulatory updates, and industry trends delivered straight to your inbox.